• New TOR Mirror: suicidffbey666ur5gspccbcw2zc7yoat34wbybqa3b
    oei6bysflbvqd.onion

  • Hey Guest,

    If you want to donate, we have a thread with updated donation options here at this link: About Donations

S

Slough Walker

Member
Apr 22, 2024
26
I don't believe that we live in a simulated universe, and I'm not convinced that we could know even if we did. However, the possibility of a simulated universe gives rise to some truly horrifying potential outcomes. To summarize the simulation hypothesis: If humanity survives, then advances in computing power and understanding of human brains may allow our descendants to simulate us, their ancestors, on computers of the future. If our descendants develop the ability and have the will to simulate their ancestors on computers of the future, then there would be one real universe and many simulated universes. In that case, it is highly probable that any given universe would be a simulated universe.

Here's where the horror comes in. Consider these possible simulated universes.

1) Fundamentalist Universe: Everyone who dies disbelieving in a particular god or set of religious beliefs experiences a simulation of hell at death. Everyone else experiences a simulation of heaven at death.
2) Skepticist Universe: Everyone who dies believing in any god or set of religious beliefs experiences hell at death. Everyone else gets annihilated at death.
3) Moralistic Universe: Everyone who dies after committing some amount of harm or evil experiences hell at death. Everyone else gets annihilated at death.
4) Inverted Universe: Everyone who dies after creating some amount of benefit or good experiences hell at death. Everyone else gets annihilated at death.
5) Tormented Universe: Everyone who dies experiences hell at death.

Having said all this, I strongly believe that these horrible simulations will always be impossible. To develop the planet-sized computers required for such a simulation in the first place, our descendants would have to evolve their ethics to the point that torturing other sentient beings would be unthinkable. Otherwise, our descendants necessarily would annihilate themselves or impede their own technological progress to the point that such a vast undertaking couldn't be organized and executed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: youshallrideeternal, sserafim and Forever Sleep
F

frost_

Member
Jun 6, 2024
13
I don't remember if I read it here, but someone said something similar, that species-wide cooperation is the great filter.

Something else interesting to think about, I think we're limited by the slow evolutionary rate of our biology compared to our intellectual and technological advances.

Doesn't matter if one dictator or one greedy CEO passes away because there will always be the same ratio of rotten people in the world.

Thing that would really change things is if we could evolve past our biology faster than waiting millions of years.

If simulation is reality, then our biology isn't the limiting factor unless it's simulated to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slough Walker and sserafim
S

Slough Walker

Member
Apr 22, 2024
26
I don't remember if I read it here, but someone said something similar, that species-wide cooperation is the great filter.
Very well stated. I agree 100% that species-wide cooperation is a requirement for the simulation hypothesis to be reality.
 

Similar threads

L
Replies
31
Views
973
Suicide Discussion
Aloneandinpain
A
worthIess
Replies
48
Views
2K
Suicide Discussion
stuck_here
stuck_here
sserafim
Replies
3
Views
255
Suicide Discussion
Twiceler
Twiceler
frustratedcivilian
Replies
7
Views
435
Politics & Philosophy
thenamingofcats
T
pthnrdnojvsc
Replies
27
Views
468
Suicide Discussion
dask
dask