Read my response to him again. Formulating a general, completely negative evaluation of the membership of this forum (presumably if you're not suicidal you have no reason to be here) that mirrors the common prejudices against suicidal individuals is insulting, disrespectful and inflammatory.
This forum is supposed to be a safe haven for the suicidal yet we're told by the OP we shouldn't bitch and whine and our problems are solely due to our own fault... How can you deem this acceptable?
If posting a blanket condemnation and blaming of the suicidal with zero argumentation on a forum dedicated to the respectful discussion of suicide is not inflammatory the term loses all meaning.
As the rules clearly state the freedom of speech on this forum is limited by the respect owed to each individual here ('we will not allow disrespect'): since the OP expressed his general disdain for the suicidal ('My opinion of suicidal people has gone down...') it logically applies to all those who belong to that group of people and he did show disrespect to everyone in that category.
Ergo he did violate the rules and he's not entitled to voicing that opinion.
It's probably true that some people take zero responsibility for their own lives and problems but that is not what the OP said and his opinion is factually incorrect.
I fucking work for a living and I contribute to society inspite of my physical problems and my mental pain. The sole reason I stay alive is due to concern for the well-being of my family. My problems are not self-created, I do take responsibility for my own life and I don't need to be lectured by some oaf on the internet on the supposed cause of my problems nor do I need to be told to quit exercising my faculty of critical thinking.
There are a lot of things that are wrong with this society and a lot of misery is created by others. I detest the psychologizing of serious problems (it's all in your head, due to your behaviour) that lead one to consider taking one's own life along with other ad hominem fallacies directed at the suicidal.
To see them repeated on this forum is apalling and disgusting.
1. Asking me to read your response to him again is a bit insulting and implying I'm not intelligent enough to grasp your deep words. I fully understood both points of view.
2. 'Formulating a general, completely negative evaluation of the membership of this forum (presumably if you're not suicidal you have no reason to be here) that mirrors the common prejudices against suicidal individuals is insulting, disrespectful and inflammatory.'
Well, that's just YOUR interpretation, so I don't think you should be expressing it as if it were truth writ in stone. And he didn't formulate a completely neg evaluation, he just said his opinion's not as positive as it was. That's up to him. It's an opinion, not inflammatory. That's just your interpretation, and I for one disagree.
3. About bitching and whining, it's a personal thing. I don't like anyone who bitches and whines and does fuck all to try to change their situation. That's not confined to ctb, and it also extends (most of all!) to me.
And yes, it probably is a 'safe haven' but also a safe haven for free expression of diverse views on our ctb.
4. 'Ergo he did violate the rules and he's not entitled to voicing that opinion'
'Ergo' tosh! This is like some people who express an opinion and then say "...end of!" 'Violate rules', 'not entitled to voice opinion'??? And why so aggressive?
5. We all 'fucking work for a living...'
We all 'fucking work for a living'. Is that line of argument supposed to give you some kind of high ground and silence other people's opinions?? And I didn't see a 'lecture'. I've given lectures in my past, but never one consisting of two sentences (although many students might have wished it was only two sentences).
6. I didn't see anything 'disgusting and appalling' in the OP's two sentences. If you did, that's your opinion (and only that).
Anyway, life's (literally) too short for crap like this.