Do you think there are or were high politicians involved in pedocriminal activities? If yes who? Drop names.

[noname223]

I think Matt Gaetz is sort of confirmed.
Many say Biden how he sniffed the hair of young chldren/touched them inappropriately. There are video compilations of that. But there are also a lot of deepfakes. There was Yoututbe video where a fake voice of Joe Biden admitted to crimes someone posted it here. I don't think though that he is a pedocriminal.
Trump though was the best friend of Jeffrey Epstein according to these tapes and mainstream media did not report about it prior to the election which was more than a little bit sketchy.

Jeffrey Epstein details close relationship with Trump in newly released tapes

Recordings from 2017 reveal Epstein talking for some ‘100 hours’ about the ex-president, journalist Michael Wolff says

www.theguardian.com

I am not fully convinced that Trump was actually involved in those crimes. There seems to be more hints than in Biden's case though. I mean Trump is a convicted felon and was offically a rapist according to a jury trial. So glad I live in Germany and noone will ever be able to prosecute me for spitting facts.

In Germany there are less allegations of this nature. There were some meth and cocaine additcs in the Socialdemocratic party the party I usually vote for. There was also a very infamous pedocriminal in the party some years ago.

There are often allegations against the Greens they were pedophiles. Due to the fact they are associated with the 68th movement of sexual liberation. There were people who claimed also children had a sexuality to explore. But I am not an expert on it.

I think I am quite glad there are in general less widespread conspiracies in Germany. The allegations of being a pedocriminal isn't as common as in the US. I think the polarization is really toxic because it is one of the worst allegation to ruin someone's reputation. And this is why I suggest to drop names in an anonymous suicide forum which seems to be a logical and reasonable conclusion laying out my arguments in this thread.

 

[notreallybored]

ב''ה,

So the weird thing about taking a tour of religious ethics and morals is.. while folks have changed so much in the past two decades, teens and adults have both been horny historically, 14 used to be adulthood and marrying age though life may have been nasty and short..

The Noachide laws include 'no adultery,' and a less strict view of that is that, anyone anyone is banging needs the "benefits of marriage" - a home, health, well-being and general welfare, not to be left feeling bad for sharing their body that way.

We have an economic system that makes this practically impossible except for the billionaire class, and to join the billionaire class you'd have to at least give a fuck about accruing that much wealth while people are dying around you (and/or be insanely lucky).

Dan Savage used to call this the campsite rule for the less religious side of sex politics - leave your partners better off whether the liason lasts or not.


Not saying adults playing with kids is good or vice versa, just that on top of everything else weird and gross, the "leave them better off" is difficult to begin with and made practically impossible by the clouds of sadism and economics in USA particularly. You can't laugh off a drunken fling (whether teenaged or 30+) if it leaves you broke and homeless.

As the zoomers have noticed, every aspect of "free love" "Pride" and "pro-sex" culture, even if it might be possibly biologically healthy (at least for males avoiding prostate issues later) is a horrible Pleasure Island trip into needing to work to pay to lick your wounds over whatever sex stuff you've experienced. Meanwhile, Europe sure can be libertine but at least acknowledges that people break up sometimes and need places to live, food to eat etc., while USA has the most Catholic mores on that, pretending G-d should punish people if love doesn't last.