• Hey Guest,

    We will never comply with any of OFCOM's demands or any other nations censorious demands for that matter. We will only follow the laws of the land of which our server is located, which is the US.

    Any demands for censorship or requests to comply with the law outside of the US will be promptly ignored.

    No foreign laws or pressure will make us comply with anti-censorship laws and we will protect the speech of our members, regardless of where they might live in the world. If that means being blocked in the UK, so be it. We would advise that any UK member gets a VPN to browse the site, or use TOR.

    However, today, we stand up these these governments that want to bully or censor this website.

    Fuck OFCOM, and fuck any media organization or group that think it's cool or fun to stalk or bully people that suffering in this world.

    Edit: We also wanted to address the veiled threats made against a staff member in the UK by the BBC in the news today. We are undeterred by any threats, intimination, by the BBC or by any other groups dedicated to doxxing and harassing our staff and members. Journalists from the BBC, CTV, Kansas Star, Daily Mail and many other outlets have continuiously ignored the fact that many of the people that they're interviewing (such as @leelfc84 on Twitter/X) and propping up are the same people posting addresses of staff members and our founders on social media. We show them proof of this and they ignore it and don't address it.They're all just as evil as each other, and should be treated accordingly. They do not care about the safety of our staff members, founders, or administrators, or even members, so why would they care about you?

    Now that we have your attention, journalists, will you ever address this? You've given these evil people interviews, and free press.

N

noname223

Angelic
Aug 18, 2020
4,830
I am ambivalent about it. Sometimes I am annoyed that both are associated with the label pro-choice it can lead to misunderstandings.
But I am on both very liberal. There were critics who said that in this forum there is a too strong competition who is the most pro-choice person. I think this could be true. It is a difficult topic to talk about without becoming too obsessed about ideologies and labels.

I think being pro-choice on abortion is globally speaking more widespread. In Germany liberal assisted suicide laws are more controversial than abortion rights. But polls show Germans welcome both.

Many dogmatic religious people oppose both. The US has way more of them than in Germany.

I don't have a good input but I am interested in good replies.
 
Downdraft

Downdraft

.
Feb 6, 2024
500
Everything should be separated from politics.

Here, I'd only create even more enemies, harassment, heat and anger around it. Anything that gets politized will get a huge chunk of people rationalizing hating on it and have even more conflict than it already has.
 
N

noname223

Angelic
Aug 18, 2020
4,830
Everything should be separated from politics. Here, I'd only create even more enemies, harassment, heat and anger around it.
I am not sure whether you understood my question right. Not the topics should separated from politics. But both of the topics should discussed in completely separate ways as if there was no connection between them.

I am not a native speaker it is probably my fault.
 
Agon321

Agon321

I use google translate
Aug 21, 2023
1,325
I think that these two topics should be approached separately.

I support abortion on demand and euthanasia.
I am generally liberal in many things.

But I would not like the discussion about abortion to be combined with the discussion about euthanasia.
Of course, both of these topics have a common denominator: the autonomy of one's own body.
But I think that in this situation it is better to focus on one topic.

The topic of abortion and euthanasia is polarizing enough, so there is no need to make the situation worse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YandereMikuMistress and sserafim