It'sNotLookingGood
You Know I Couldn't Last
- Mar 1, 2020
- 221
Hi, this community is really encouraging and I'm happy to have found it very recently :)
In The Peaceful Pill Handbook", "detergent death", or hydrogen sulfide, is stated to cause "rapid death", be an incredibly reliable method of suicide (levels above 1% equating to "certain death"), and be "easily produced using readily active ingredients". Despite this, it is strongly discouraged in the book, and as a result, barely covered. Can some people please help explain why it is so heavily discouraged, and discarded as a method?
Is it simply the risk this method can pose to other people? Surely, given you take some care, the risk can be minimalised greatly. For example, if I were to simply buy a tent, go somewhere quiet and isolated, like a field, and leave a big loud sign to warn those who find me of the toxic gas inside the tent, where is the risk? Has it not been minimalised to so great an extent, that it is largely negligible?
Therefore I am lead to believe it perhaps a particularly painful death? The book does rate it a 3/10 for peacefulness (10/10 being a peaceful death), but why? Is it genuinely terribly painful, and how so if "concentrations of over 0.1%(1000ppm) will lead to immeadiate loss of consciousness and rapid death"?
Is it then discarded as a """peaceful""" method, just because of the stench, a stench that you yourself won't even smell as levels of H₂S rise?
I feel genuinely uninformed on what the drawbacks are here, and would like to have them clarified by someone more knowledgeable. Why is this an undesirable, unpeaceful way to die?Thank you :)
In The Peaceful Pill Handbook", "detergent death", or hydrogen sulfide, is stated to cause "rapid death", be an incredibly reliable method of suicide (levels above 1% equating to "certain death"), and be "easily produced using readily active ingredients". Despite this, it is strongly discouraged in the book, and as a result, barely covered. Can some people please help explain why it is so heavily discouraged, and discarded as a method?
Is it simply the risk this method can pose to other people? Surely, given you take some care, the risk can be minimalised greatly. For example, if I were to simply buy a tent, go somewhere quiet and isolated, like a field, and leave a big loud sign to warn those who find me of the toxic gas inside the tent, where is the risk? Has it not been minimalised to so great an extent, that it is largely negligible?
Therefore I am lead to believe it perhaps a particularly painful death? The book does rate it a 3/10 for peacefulness (10/10 being a peaceful death), but why? Is it genuinely terribly painful, and how so if "concentrations of over 0.1%(1000ppm) will lead to immeadiate loss of consciousness and rapid death"?
Is it then discarded as a """peaceful""" method, just because of the stench, a stench that you yourself won't even smell as levels of H₂S rise?
I feel genuinely uninformed on what the drawbacks are here, and would like to have them clarified by someone more knowledgeable. Why is this an undesirable, unpeaceful way to die?Thank you :)