callmeskin
͎S͎͎k͎͎i͎͎n͎
- Sep 14, 2023
- 28
I really like debating so i want to start a debate on the question : Do you think SaSu is doing more harm than good?
Doesn't matter if you disagree or agree just swy whatever argument you'd like to raise and let others debate
I'll start
-
Removing sanctioned suicide websites does not prevent suicide; it removes regulation. When regulated platforms are banned, individuals turn to unmoderated spaces where misinformation and harm are more likely.
There is no evidence that regulated access to information causes increased suicide rates. Access is not promotion. The relevant policy comparison is regulated transparency versus unregulated secrecy, and harm reduction frameworks consistently favor regulation.
This debate is about outcomes, not discomfort. Suicide exists regardless of censorship. Sanctioned platforms introduce oversight, safeguards, and intervention where none would otherwise exist. From a public health perspective, regulation reduces harm more effectively than prohibition.
Therefore, SaSu though imperfect do more good than harm.
Doesn't matter if you disagree or agree just swy whatever argument you'd like to raise and let others debate
I'll start
-
Removing sanctioned suicide websites does not prevent suicide; it removes regulation. When regulated platforms are banned, individuals turn to unmoderated spaces where misinformation and harm are more likely.
There is no evidence that regulated access to information causes increased suicide rates. Access is not promotion. The relevant policy comparison is regulated transparency versus unregulated secrecy, and harm reduction frameworks consistently favor regulation.
This debate is about outcomes, not discomfort. Suicide exists regardless of censorship. Sanctioned platforms introduce oversight, safeguards, and intervention where none would otherwise exist. From a public health perspective, regulation reduces harm more effectively than prohibition.
Therefore, SaSu though imperfect do more good than harm.