Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.
If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.
Donate via cryptocurrency:
Bitcoin (BTC):
Ethereum (ETH):
Monero (XMR):
Ctb method
Thread starterHAKMKS
Start date
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Do you intend to bury yourself alive? Well, in theory, if the closet was 100% airtight, the CO2 level would slowly rise as you are breathing and sooner but later your SI would signal that there is too much CO2 and you'd feel suffocation until you die. That's not a good idea as it's slow and painful and besides that, I doubt that you could seal a closet as airtight as it is needed for this experiment.
You can't fight the suffocation at some point you will come out, it is a brutal death if no drugs involved, you won't be falling sleep and die, you will suffocate and die
You can't fight the suffocation at some point you will come out, it is a brutal death if no drugs involved, you won't be falling sleep and die, you will suffocate and die
Well, the CO method (using charcoal) isn't painful at all because the gas (CO) itself is lethal very quickly and not SI is kicking in. So why not thinking of placing a BBQ into the closet that makes it much easier and much more pleasant. I don't get why people always search for painful and difficult methods that most likely don't work. This stuff has been discussed so many times here CO2 vs CO ..... I don't get it.
Yes all methods can fail, unfortunately. That's true. But will good preparation the failure rate can be reduced a lot. Unfortunately there are no methods easily accessible and all of them have risks except N which is difficult to be obtained and if possible only on person.
Do you intend to bury yourself alive? Well, in theory, if the closet was 100% airtight, the CO2 level would slowly rise as you are breathing and sooner but later your SI would signal that there is too much CO2 and you'd feel suffocation until you die. That's not a good idea as it's slow and painful and besides that, I doubt that you could seal a closet as airtight as it is needed for this experiment.
Well, the CO method (using charcoal) isn't painful at all because the gas (CO) itself is lethal very quickly and not SI is kicking in. So why not thinking of placing a BBQ into the closet that makes it much easier and much more pleasant. I don't get why people always search for painful and difficult methods that most likely don't work. This stuff has been discussed so many times here CO2 vs CO ..... I don't get it.
Well, the CO method (using charcoal) isn't painful at all because the gas (CO) itself is lethal very quickly and not SI is kicking in. So why not thinking of placing a BBQ into the closet that makes it much easier and much more pleasant. I don't get why people always search for painful and difficult methods that most likely don't work. This stuff has been discussed so many times here CO2 vs CO ..... I don't get it.
Well, the CO method (using charcoal) isn't painful at all because the gas (CO) itself is lethal very quickly and not SI is kicking in. So why not thinking of placing a BBQ into the closet that makes it much easier and much more pleasant. I don't get why people always search for painful and difficult methods that most likely don't work. This stuff has been discussed so many times here CO2 vs CO ..... I don't get it.
The difference is a chemical difference. the one is CO2 carbondixode this is what humans usualy exhale and the human body has "sensors" to detect when there is too much CO2 ("carbondioxide) in the surrounding air because that will lead to suffocation. That's why SI kicks in in at this point. Unless you are in a coma or deeply unconscious you body will try to do everything to escape this situation.
It's different with CO (carbonmonoxide). You cannot sense it in any case, there is no Si kicking in and depending on the concentration you will feel just a little bit of headache / nausea and the like but if you dont leave this place you might just fall asleep deeper and deeper. And if you are in a place with high concentration (>10000 ppm ) this can take just minuts to seconds to lose consciousness, without SI kicking in. You have no chance to leave this place any more. That's why CO is so dangerous to people who do not intend to CTB.
And that is the difference between CO2 and CO in regards to CTB.
I hope that explanation helped you in making your own desicsions.
For me personally SN isn't an option because it needs to many different other meds and it's at least a process of 12 - 24h incl "fasting". However SN is a suitable and almost painless method for the ones who wish for it.
hanging and especially jumping sound so cruel and horrible to me. But if hanging especially full suspension hanging is performed correct there is a high chance of having a mor eor less peaceful death, With full suspension hanging it's a 100% chance even though it canbe painful in the last minutes if one is not being recsued it 's a 100% method.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.