A

aGoodDayToDie

Arcanist
Jun 30, 2023
461
Today the campaign for choice at the end of life took a leap forward. Assisted dying in the UK is now a matter of 'when' not 'if.' We couldn't have reached this point without your support, so thank you to all the individuals, families, healthcare professionals and legislators who submitted evidence. Since December 2022, the Health and Social Care Select Committee has been running the first ever House of Commons inquiry into assisted dying. Today, they published their report.

A cross-party committee of MPs has heard months of evidence, data and personal testimony outlining the many serious harms caused by the UK's blanket ban on assisted dying. It found evidence that the current law is unsafe and inadequate, with the Health and Social Care Select Committee calling on the Government to engage in the debate as reform becomes "increasingly likely" across the British Isles.

The evidence is clear: the current law is not working. Maintaining the status quo in the face of so much obvious, devastating harm - while assisted dying laws continue to work safely overseas - is the most dangerous decision that Westminster could take.​

The political appetite for a full and fair debate on assisted dying is growing by the day. Jody, if you haven't already, please sign our government petition calling for a free vote on assisted dying.


"Having the option of an assisted death would bring me so much peace of mind: knowing that I would have that choice to end my pain, whether I'd take that option or not." - David Minns who gave evidence to the inquiry. He had multiple myeloma, and died in 2023 just weeks after submitting his evidence.

Personal testimony of the impact of the current law included heart-rending accounts of terminally ill people who ended their lives in lonely and often violent ways, while others had to endure arduous and costly journeys to access legal assisted dying services in Switzerland. Every terminally ill person involved in the committee's roundtable sessions said that the law has to change.

Evidence revealed palliative care cannot relieve all suffering and the legalisation of assisted dying was linked to improvements in end-of-life care overseas. It also found there to be no 'slippery slope': assisted dying laws for terminally ill people did not expand beyond their original criteria.

Throughout the inquiry, frontline experts from countries where assisted dying is legal – including Australia and the US - provided substantial evidence showing these laws are effective and popular, benefiting from robust safeguards that protect dying people.​

The committee called on the government to engage in the assisted dying debate.

But we need to keep the pressure on MPs to change the law. If you've already signed the petition, will you share it with your family and friends?


This report shifts the prospect of an assisted dying law for the UK from a hypothetical to a reality. Both the Prime Minister and Leader of the Opposition accept this is a conversation we must have and have pledged to set aside time for it to be fully and fairly debated in the next Parliament.

Assisted dying will be a key issue for candidates going into the General Election, and voters should watch closely for which candidates back change and which are defending a dangerous and unpopular law. The next generation of MPs must listen to the public mood and finally break the deadlock on assisted dying.​
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Hugs
Reactions: Flailure 513282, butterball, RemainingDubious and 2 others
F

Forever Sleep

Earned it we have...
May 4, 2022
9,308
Better than nothing I guess. Not 100% sure I'll crack out the champagne yet though...

I'm of course relieved for people who are already suffering horrifically and inhumanely. Fingers crossed our government will finally have mercy on you and let you leave with dignity.

The rest of us though? What do we have to look forward to? 20-50+ years of back breaking work till we destroy our bodies to an acceptable level to qualify... Doesn't sound much of an incentive to me personally. I reckon the majority of us will still have to risk DIY methods if we want out before we experience a verified level of chronic and untreatable pain. But still- it's a step in the right direction I guess. Perhaps we won't have to witness our grandparents or parents suffer terribly at the end. Not sure I've got the patience to wait out my declining years though. I certainly don't have the money!
 
  • Like
  • Hugs
Reactions: aGoodDayToDie and RemainingDubious
L

lifewasawillowtv

You’re losing me
Nov 12, 2023
216
My guess is they'll find a way to push it back- like they have done with the one in Canada- and just keep finding more ways to keep pushing it back. We can still hope though I guess. Most of us on here won't qualify for it but it's still something.
 
  • Like
  • Hugs
Reactions: aGoodDayToDie and RemainingDubious
wait.what

wait.what

no really, what?
Aug 14, 2020
984
All this after the fit the UK pitched over the existence of this website…as I said at the time, it's not about "the sanctity of life" one bit. It's about getting the proper permissions before you're allowed out of this place. Imagine a customs and excise line to stand in before you're allowed to die.

Last I heard, some trans people in the UK were waiting upwards of two years for consult appointments about HRT. Actually, I have heard estimates as high as five. How much you want to bet that having 6 months or less to live is a requirement for medical aid in dying? That'll be interesting. (I get that medical transition is treated as kind of an expensive toy over there, but the overall problem of getting specialist care when you're not private pay is real enough—if a deliberately engineered issue. I hope Thatcher is in hell, forced to write this on a blackboard for all eternity: "The problem with capitalism is sooner or later you run out of other people's health to squander.")
 
  • Like
Reactions: aGoodDayToDie
A

aGoodDayToDie

Arcanist
Jun 30, 2023
461
All this after the fit the UK pitched over the existence of this website…as I said at the time, it's not about "the sanctity of life" one bit. It's about getting the proper permissions before you're allowed out of this place. Imagine a customs and excise line to stand in before you're allowed to die.

Last I heard, some trans people in the UK were waiting upwards of two years for consult appointments about HRT. Actually, I have heard estimates as high as five. How much you want to bet that having 6 months or less to live is a requirement for medical aid in dying? That'll be interesting. (I get that medical transition is treated as kind of an expensive toy over there, but the overall problem of getting specialist care when you're not private pay is real enough—if a deliberately engineered issue. I hope Thatcher is in hell, forced to write this on a blackboard for all eternity: "The problem with capitalism is sooner or later you run out of other people's health to squander.")
Yeah thing is there's an ENORMOUS difference between this site, and euthanasia. Every country with euthanasia has very robust procedures to ensure suicides are not impulsive, that suffering is intolerable and the patient is treatment resistant or has no cure. Quite frankly, this site tells people how to kill themselves with risky methods even when they haven't tried any professional help to get better, whatsoever.

Hopefully one day, anyone in the world will be able to put their trust in euthanasia doctors to help get treatments that work, and as a last resort, grant euthanasia. This will let people put their hands in a doctor that will have compassion as their first priority, and protecting people from themselves, protect them from making impulsive decisions that would ruin their lives, or cause lufelong grief to a great number of other people