N
noname223
Archangel
- Aug 18, 2020
- 6,457
Today, I read an article that called for more human empathy to tackle the authoritarian uprising and panic concerning migration.
The person is against giving right-wing populists a platform in talk shows. (I agree) Whereas we have to talk with right-wing voters. Just for the sheer fact there are so many of them in all classes of society.
The person cites a social experiment where in the US (the author is Austrian) there were groups consisting mostly of leftwingers/minorities who were talking to voters. They should discuss with them in a non confrontative way politics. They wanted that the voters imagined how it feels like to be in the shoes of trans people. The voters shall rethink their stereotypes about them. And according to her this worked. It had a longterm impact on their political attitudes.
Honestly, I don't believe that. From my experience debating right-wingers there were people to debate. But some of them are principled and their anger is not driven by prejudices. They just enjoy bullying minorities. I wouldn't recommend trans people to debate fucking all right-wing voters with no exception. Noone should have to endure that. And I doubt it would make a difference.
There was this right-wing acquaintance I had. He became more and more extreme. But when we had contact I had some success to keep him less extreme. But he drifted further and further. And I didn't consider it acceptable any longer. I am used to a lot because of my dad. But this dude. When we had contact some years later he was a full extremist. I had positive impact on him while we had contact. But he is a lost cause. It is useless to debate him. He enjoys to spread hatred. People like that should be ignored. Not all right-wing voters are poor victims manipulated by politicians. Some people are principled racists.
What do you think?
The person is against giving right-wing populists a platform in talk shows. (I agree) Whereas we have to talk with right-wing voters. Just for the sheer fact there are so many of them in all classes of society.
The person cites a social experiment where in the US (the author is Austrian) there were groups consisting mostly of leftwingers/minorities who were talking to voters. They should discuss with them in a non confrontative way politics. They wanted that the voters imagined how it feels like to be in the shoes of trans people. The voters shall rethink their stereotypes about them. And according to her this worked. It had a longterm impact on their political attitudes.
Honestly, I don't believe that. From my experience debating right-wingers there were people to debate. But some of them are principled and their anger is not driven by prejudices. They just enjoy bullying minorities. I wouldn't recommend trans people to debate fucking all right-wing voters with no exception. Noone should have to endure that. And I doubt it would make a difference.
There was this right-wing acquaintance I had. He became more and more extreme. But when we had contact I had some success to keep him less extreme. But he drifted further and further. And I didn't consider it acceptable any longer. I am used to a lot because of my dad. But this dude. When we had contact some years later he was a full extremist. I had positive impact on him while we had contact. But he is a lost cause. It is useless to debate him. He enjoys to spread hatred. People like that should be ignored. Not all right-wing voters are poor victims manipulated by politicians. Some people are principled racists.
What do you think?
Last edited: