J
JustSwingingTheD
Experienced
- Jan 31, 2022
- 204
I think it's our moral obligation as the spearhead of evolution to destroy all life on earth. I base my opinion on the simple fact that all life at it's core is unnecessary suffering for nothing. Humanity alone going extinct would solve nothing in the long run, life would go on and evolution would eventually create a species close to our intelligence again.
Euthanasia for the whole planet would never be a result of a democratic decision, but some madman with enough resources and intelligence could achieve it. Let's all hope and pray that this madman soon appears. But how exactly could he achieve this?
By utilizing global warming? I must confess i'm not that educated on the subject, but somehow i don't believe the situation is yet that bad. I think that there will be huge problems caused by global warming, but the runaway greenhouse effect is going to take a lot more warming up than we have in the forecast. Artifically warming up the planet would take a huge amount of resources and wouldn't be a convenient way of bringing the end, so i'm sceptical about the usefulness of this method.
By causing a nuclear holocaust? Yeah, no. A global nuclear war would just make our already shitty planet more shitty. But no extinction, not for humans or for most species.
I'm sure that if some of the top physicists of our time could be convinced that this should be done, then it would be relatively easy to find a fast and easy method for the whole planet to CTB. Some chemicals that dissolve the atmosphere extremely effectively for example, just create huge amounts of those.
Your ideas are welcome
Euthanasia for the whole planet would never be a result of a democratic decision, but some madman with enough resources and intelligence could achieve it. Let's all hope and pray that this madman soon appears. But how exactly could he achieve this?
By utilizing global warming? I must confess i'm not that educated on the subject, but somehow i don't believe the situation is yet that bad. I think that there will be huge problems caused by global warming, but the runaway greenhouse effect is going to take a lot more warming up than we have in the forecast. Artifically warming up the planet would take a huge amount of resources and wouldn't be a convenient way of bringing the end, so i'm sceptical about the usefulness of this method.
By causing a nuclear holocaust? Yeah, no. A global nuclear war would just make our already shitty planet more shitty. But no extinction, not for humans or for most species.
I'm sure that if some of the top physicists of our time could be convinced that this should be done, then it would be relatively easy to find a fast and easy method for the whole planet to CTB. Some chemicals that dissolve the atmosphere extremely effectively for example, just create huge amounts of those.
Your ideas are welcome